Rivers United vs Shooting Stars Prediction, Fair Odds & Result
Model answer: Home at 52%. Home is 52%, draw 29% and away 19%. These are clearly labelled sample figures until the production pipeline is connected.
One URL, complete history
Final — result reviewed
The original prediction is preserved beside the final score of 2–0.
Calibrated 1X2 view
Home, draw and away probabilities
- H · Rivers United
- 52%
- D · Draw
- 29%
- A · Shooting Stars
- 19%
| H — Rivers United | D — Draw | A — Shooting Stars |
|---|---|---|
| 52%probability | 29%probability | 19%probability |
| 1.92fair odds | 3.45fair odds | 5.26fair odds |
Calibration mirror
What does this confidence mean in reality?
52% is the largest probability, not certainty. The other two outcomes still carry 48% combined, and the top two outcomes are separated by 23%.
- Settled forecasts
- 8
- Mean forecast
- 55.4%
- Observed frequency
- 50.0%
- Calibration gap
- 5.4%
These labelled sample rows were already settled before this demo forecast was published. They are not evidence of production performance.
Open the current full accuracy ledgerHistorical probability shapes
Probability Neighbours
Before publication, 12 settled forecasts with the closest full 1X2 probability shapes were selected from all published leagues and model versions. Actual outcomes were 7 home wins, 4 draws and 1 away wins. Their mean prediction was home 52.6%, draw 27.5% and away 19.9%; mean class-averaged Brier score was 0.1906. Mean Total Variation distance was 4.3% and the maximum was 7.0%. Every selected record is within the fixed 10% Total Variation window. This is a small sample below 30 records, so it is descriptive evidence rather than proof of model skill or a promise about this match.
As of
A distance of 5% means five probability points must be redistributed to turn one 1X2 split into the other. Match results, scores, Hit/Miss labels and Brier scores never participate in neighbour selection. This historical view does not change the current prediction.
- Settled neighbours
- 12
- Selection scope
- all published leagues and model versions
- Mean distance
- 4.3%
- Maximum distance
- 7.0%
- Average Brier
- 0.1906
What actually happened
Observed H/D/A outcomes
- Home win
- 758.3%
- Draw
- 433.3%
- Away win
- 18.3%
Swipe horizontally to inspect probabilities, result, distance and verdict.
| Historical record | Published H / D / A | Actual result | TV distance | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villarreal vs GetafeLa Liga | H 53%D 29%A 18% | D · DrawFinal score 0–0 | 1.0% | Demo Miss |
| AFC Leopards vs BandariFKF Premier League | H 54%D 27%A 19% | H · Home winFinal score 2–1 | 2.0% | Demo Hit |
| Shabana vs Ulinzi StarsFKF Premier League | H 51%D 27%A 22% | D · DrawFinal score 1–1 | 3.0% | Demo Miss |
| Atletico Madrid vs SevillaLa Liga | H 55%D 27%A 18% | H · Home winFinal score 2–0 | 3.0% | Demo Hit |
| Aston Villa vs EvertonPremier League | H 49%D 28%A 23% | H · Home winFinal score 2–1 | 4.0% | Demo Hit |
| Enyimba vs Kano PillarsNigeria Premier Football League | H 56%D 27%A 17% | H · Home winFinal score 2–1 | 4.0% | Demo Hit |
| Roma vs FiorentinaSerie A | H 48%D 29%A 23% | D · DrawFinal score 1–1 | 4.0% | Demo Miss |
| Juventus vs TorinoSerie A | H 57%D 27%A 16% | D · DrawFinal score 1–1 | 5.0% | Demo Miss |
| Manchester City vs ChelseaPremier League | H 58%D 24%A 18% | A · Away winFinal score 1–2 | 6.0% | Demo Miss |
| Gor Mahia vs TuskerFKF Premier League | H 46%D 30%A 24% | H · Home winFinal score 2–0 | 6.0% | Demo Hit |
| Inter vs BolognaSerie A | H 59%D 25%A 16% | H · Home winFinal score 2–0 | 7.0% | Demo Hit |
| Bandari vs Kakamega HomeboyzFKF Premier League | H 45%D 30%A 25% | H · Home winFinal score 1–0 | 7.0% | Demo Hit |
Publication proof
Forecast identity
- Published
- Model version
- FPAI-LGBM 0.9.3
- Competition
- NPFL
- Confidence
- 52%
- Record SHA-256
- Not issued for demo data
Demo notice: the timestamp, model version and figures on this preview are sample data, so no production record fingerprint is issued. Official records are generated automatically at least 24 hours before kick-off.
Kito calibration challenge
Make your call before the whistle
Set your own home, draw and away split. It stays only in this browser, saves the match to your private desk, and can be scored beside the locked model after the result.
Loading your device-local call…
Your selected probabilities never leave this device · anonymous aggregate use counters respect Global Privacy Control and Do Not Track · excluded from the public ledger, accuracy, APIs and structured data · not betting advice
Interactive counterfactual
What would have to change?
Move three transparent assumptions and watch the probability shape respond. This is an educational sensitivity test, not a second model and never an edit to the demo record.
Nearest illustrative flip
5-point gridFind the smallest move from the neutral official baseline that puts another outcome at least 0.5 percentage points ahead.
This boundary is a sensitivity illustration—not a new prediction. Missing-information stress stays at 0 and the official record never changes.
- Top-two gap
- 23 pts
- Uncertainty
- High
- Official record
- Unchanged
Illustrative Scenario v1. Method: apply visible log-probability shifts, then normalise with softmax; the stress control raises temperature toward a flatter split. Boundary search uses only team balance and draw pressure on a 5-point grid, holds stress at zero, and requires the target to lead by at least 0.5 percentage points.
Why the model leans this way
Leading match factors
- 01
Rivers United entered with four home wins in five.
- 02
Shooting Stars' away goal rate ranked below the league median.
- 03
Venue-adjusted Elo supplied most of the home advantage.
Grounded record explainer
Ask Kito about this probability
Kito can read only this labelled demo record. It cannot browse for hidden context, change the probabilities, suggest a stake, or promise a result.
Instant evidence mode is deterministic and makes no external model request. Optional AI response planning remains off until a server-side OpenAI key and budget switch are configured. When enabled, the model can only choose a full or compact view of server-authored evidence.
This is a labelled demo record. The top call is home win at 52%. Across a sufficiently large set of genuinely comparable 52% forecasts, that outcome should occur about 52 times in 100—not every time. The other two outcomes still hold 48% combined probability.
- Locked probability splitHome 52% · Draw 29% · Away 19%
- Model versionFPAI-LGBM 0.9.3
- Publication time2026-07-07T07:10:00Z
- Probability neighbours12 prior settled records · all published leagues and model versions
Locked feature context
Model-generated explanation
The home call landed. Rivers controlled the higher-value chances and the low BTTS probability also held, while the match stayed below the model's over-2.5 lean.
Generated only from the locked pre-match feature snapshot; maximum 120 words and no change to the official probabilities.